Investigating the attentional blink with predicted targets | Zendy

Wanpeng Tan | Zendy; Veronica J. Dark | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Investigating the attentional blink with predicted targets

Author(s) -

Wanpeng Tan,

Veronica J. Dark

Publication year - 2010

Publication title -

journal of vision

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 1.126

H-Index - 113

ISSN - 1534-7362

DOI - 10.1167/7.9.702

Subject(s) - attentional blink , psychology , cued speech , identity (music) , cognitive psychology , artifact (error) , lag , extant taxon , audiology , perception , neuroscience , computer science , medicine , computer network , physics , evolutionary biology , acoustics , biology

• Targets were red letters while distractors were black letters. • Trial began with a green letter predicting either T1 or T2 (See Figure 1). • Validity of correct prediction varied (See Table 1). • SOA was 96 ms (24 ms letter duration with 72 ms blank ISI). Lags were 1-5. • Confirm strategy: subjects self-reported using green letter to identify target. Ignore strategy: subjects self-reported not using green letter to identify target. Figure 2: Experiment 1: T1 predicted on 75% of trials

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research