A secondary task leads to poorer selection of attentional control strategies | Zendy

Heather A. Hansen | Zendy; Jessica Irons | Zendy; Andrew B. Leber | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

A secondary task leads to poorer selection of attentional control strategies

Author(s) -

Heather A. Hansen,

Jessica Irons,

Andrew B. Leber

Publication year - 2018

Publication title -

journal of vision

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 1.126

H-Index - 113

ISSN - 1534-7362

DOI - 10.1167/18.10.634

Subject(s) - visual search , task (project management) , selection (genetic algorithm) , control (management) , colored , computer science , artificial intelligence , psychology , engineering , materials science , systems engineering , composite material

1Cain, M.S., Vul, E., Clark, K., & Mitroff, S.R. (2012). A Bayesian optimal foraging model of human visual search. Psychological Science, 23, 1047-1054. 2Bacon, W.F.,& Egeth, H.E. (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 485-496. 3Irons, J.L., & Leber, A.B. (2016). Choosing attentional control settings in a dynamically changing environment. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 78, 2031-2048. 4Irons, J.L., & Leber, A.B. (in press). Characterizing individual variation in the strategic use of attentional control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. Heather A. Hansen, Jessica L. Irons, Andrew B. Leber Department of Psychology & Center for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, The Ohio State University

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research