The integration of parts during visual completion is inefficient | Zendy

Jason M. Gold | Zendy; Michael A. Simmons | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

The integration of parts during visual completion is inefficient

Author(s) -

Jason M. Gold,

Michael A. Simmons

Publication year - 2012

Publication title -

journal of vision

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 1.126

H-Index - 113

ISSN - 1534-7362

DOI - 10.1167/12.9.1056

Subject(s) - observer (physics) , contrast (vision) , computer science , perception , object (grammar) , artificial intelligence , isolation (microbiology) , process (computing) , sensitivity (control systems) , pattern recognition (psychology) , computer vision , mathematics , psychology , physics , quantum mechanics , neuroscience , electronic engineering , microbiology and biotechnology , biology , engineering , operating system

disconnected parts during visual completion? THE INTEGRATION OF PARTS DURING VISUAL COMPLETION IS INEFFICIENT JASON M. GOLD & MICHAEL SIMMONS Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington • Results & Conclusions o Average integration efficiency was suboptimal for all perceptually complete conditions o Average fragmented efficiency exceeded perceptually complete efficiency for all 3 object types, and fragmented efficiency was nearly optimal for 2 of 3 object types o Lower integration efficiency with perceptually complete stimuli may be due to the use of regions where only noise -and no additional stimulus information -is present3

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research