Audiovisual Phonological Fusion and Asynchrony | Zendy

Melissa Troyer | Zendy; Jeremy L. Loebach | Zendy; David B. Pisoni | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Audiovisual Phonological Fusion and Asynchrony

Author(s) -

Melissa Troyer,

Jeremy L. Loebach,

David B. Pisoni

Publication year - 2010

Publication title -

journal of vision

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 1.126

H-Index - 113

ISSN - 1534-7362

DOI - 10.1167/10.7.895

Subject(s) - asynchrony (computer programming) , fusion , computer science , speech recognition , cognitive psychology , psychology , linguistics , philosophy , asynchronous communication , telecommunications

• Yes, synchrony judgments are robust for experimental stimuli • But synchrony judgment differs for experimental (e.g., visual back and audio lack) stimuli and control stimuli (e.g., visual back and auditory back) • For control stimuli, the threshold for synchrony judgments (defined as 50% of the max) occurs from 200 ms A-lead to 300 ms V-lead • For experimental stimuli, the threshold for synchrony judgments occurs from 166 ms A-lead to 166 ms V-lead • Subjects are more likely to respond “in sync” for control than for experimental items, F(24, 8950) = 1649.6, p < .001.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research