Neural Network Acceptability Judgments
Author(s) -
Alex Warstadt,
Amanpreet Singh,
Samuel R. Bowman
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
transactions of the association for computational linguistics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2307-387X
DOI - 10.1162/tacl_a_00290
Subject(s) - computer science , sentence , artificial intelligence , natural language processing , artificial neural network , linguistics , verb , set (abstract data type) , subject (documents) , cola (plant) , philosophy , botany , library science , biology , programming language
In this work, we explore the ability of artificial neural networks to judge the grammatical acceptability of a sentence. Machine learning research of this kind is well placed to answer important open questions about the role of prior linguistic bias in language acquisition by providing a test for the Poverty of the Stimulus Argument. In service of this goal, we introduce the Corpus of Linguistic Acceptability (CoLA), a set of 10,657 English sentences labeled as grammatical or ungrammatical by expert linguists. We train several recurrent neural networks to do binary acceptability classification. These models set a baseline for the task. Error-analysis testing the models on specific grammatical phenomena reveals that they learn some systematic grammatical generalizations like subject-verb-object word order without any grammatical supervision. We find that neural sequence models show promise on the acceptability classification task. However, human-like performance across a wide range of grammatical constructions remains far off.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom