Which aspects of the Open Science agenda are most relevant to scientometric research and publishing? An opinion paper | Zendy

Lutz Bornmann | Zendy; Raf Guns | Zendy; Mike Thelwall | Zendy; Dietmar Wolfram | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Which aspects of the Open Science agenda are most relevant to scientometric research and publishing? An opinion paper

Author(s) -

Lutz Bornmann,

Raf Guns,

Mike Thelwall,

Dietmar Wolfram

Publication year - 2021

Publication title -

quantitative science studies

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

ISSN - 2641-3337

DOI - 10.1162/qss_e_00121

Subject(s) - open science , publishing , transparency (behavior) , open data , science policy , political science , engineering ethics , scientific publishing , management science , data science , sociology , computer science , engineering , public administration , law , mathematics , statistics

Open Science is an umbrella term that encompasses many recommendations for possible changes in research practices, management, and publishing with the objective to increase transparency and accessibility. This has become an important science policy issue that all disciplines should consider. Many Open Science recommendations may be valuable for the further development of research and publishing but not all are relevant to all fields. This opinion paper considers the aspects of Open Science that are most relevant for scientometricians, discussing how they can be usefully applied.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research