English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Despite overwhelming evidence of gender-related disadvantages, discrimination, and harassment (e.g., Brower & James, 2020; Budden, Tregenza, et al., 2008; Carli, Alawa, et al., 2016; Edmunds, Ovseiko, et al., 2016; El-Alayli, Hansen-Brown, & Ceynar, 2018; Guarino & Borden, 2017; Ilies, Hauserman, et al., 2003; Jagsi, Griffith, et al., 2016; Kabat-Farr & Cortina, 2014; Knobloch-Westerwick, Glynn, & Huge, 2013; Krawczyk & Smyk, 2016; Lerchenmueller & Sorenson, 2018; MacNell, Driscoll, & Hunt, 2015; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2018; Reuben, Sapienza, & Zingales, 2014; Rivera, 2017; Rivera & Tilcsik, 2019; Sheltzer & Smith, 2014; Smyth & Nosek, 2015), Darwinist beliefs that science’s gender gap is best explained by a natural selection of the best and the brightest still echo in the corridors of many research institutions.

Selective referencing and questionable evidence in Strumia’s paper on “Gender issues in fundamental physics”