z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Interpreting the History of Evolutionary Biology through a Kuhnian Prism: Sense or Nonsense?
Author(s) -
Koen Tanghe,
Lieven Pauwels,
Alexis De Tiège,
Johan Braeckman
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
perspectives on science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.336
H-Index - 24
eISSN - 1530-9274
pISSN - 1063-6145
DOI - 10.1162/posc_a_00359
Subject(s) - modern evolutionary synthesis , nonsense , darwin (adl) , prism , epistemology , origin of species , evolutionary theory , evolutionary biology , biology , philosophy , genetics , computer science , physics , software engineering , optics , gene
Traditionally, Thomas S. Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962) is largely identified with his analysis of the structure of scientific revolutions. Here, we contribute to a minority tradition in the Kuhn literature by interpreting the history of evolutionary biology through the prism of the entire historical developmental model of sciences that he elaborates in The Structure. This research not only reveals a certain match between this model and the history of evolutionary biology but, more importantly, also sheds new light on several episodes in that history, and particularly on the publication of Charles Darwin’s On the Origin of Species (1859), the construction of the modern evolutionary synthesis, the chronic discontent with it, and the latest expression of that discontent, called the extended evolutionary synthesis. Lastly, we also explain why this kind of analysis hasn’t been done before.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom