z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Value-Free yet Policy-Relevant? The Normative Views of Climate Scientists and Their Bearing on Philosophy
Author(s) -
Torbjørn Gundersen
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
perspectives on science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.336
H-Index - 24
eISSN - 1530-9274
pISSN - 1063-6145
DOI - 10.1162/posc_a_00334
Subject(s) - ideal (ethics) , normative , value (mathematics) , climate science , politics , sociology , epistemology , political philosophy , environmental ethics , political science , climate change , law , philosophy , ecology , machine learning , computer science , biology
This article contributes to the philosophical debate on values in science by exploring how scientists themselves understand the proper role of moral, political, and social values in expert practice. I present findings from interviews with climate scientists who have participated as authors in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The climate scientists subscribe to the value-free ideal as a regulative ideal that applies both to the provision of knowledge to policymakers and how they engage with political issues in the public sphere. Yet their views on the moral responsibility of scientists and the aim of providing policy-relevant output challenge the value-free ideal. The article suggests ways in which their views can be relevant to the philosophical discussion.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom