“True Empiricism”: The Stakes of the Cousin-Schelling Controversy
Author(s) -
Daniel Whistler
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
perspectives on science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.336
H-Index - 24
eISSN - 1530-9274
pISSN - 1063-6145
DOI - 10.1162/posc_a_00323
Subject(s) - cousin , empiricism , metaphysics , epistemology , philosophy , a priori and a posteriori , law , political science
Between 1833 and 1835, Victor Cousin and F.W.J. Schelling engaged in an “amical but serious critique” of each other’s philosophies. I argue that, despite perceptions to the contrary, key to this exchange is a common vision of an atypical, speculative empiricism. That is, against the grain of most commentaries, I contend that there are significant similarities between Cousin’s and Schelling’s philosophies of the early 1830s—similarities that converge on the possibility of a post-Kantian speculative empiricism, which they respectively dub metaphysical psychology or a priori empiricism.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom