z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
“True Empiricism”: The Stakes of the Cousin-Schelling Controversy
Author(s) -
Daniel Whistler
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
perspectives on science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.336
H-Index - 24
eISSN - 1530-9274
pISSN - 1063-6145
DOI - 10.1162/posc_a_00323
Subject(s) - cousin , empiricism , metaphysics , epistemology , philosophy , a priori and a posteriori , law , political science
Between 1833 and 1835, Victor Cousin and F.W.J. Schelling engaged in an “amical but serious critique” of each other’s philosophies. I argue that, despite perceptions to the contrary, key to this exchange is a common vision of an atypical, speculative empiricism. That is, against the grain of most commentaries, I contend that there are significant similarities between Cousin’s and Schelling’s philosophies of the early 1830s—similarities that converge on the possibility of a post-Kantian speculative empiricism, which they respectively dub metaphysical psychology or a priori empiricism.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom