z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The Limits of Feedforward Vision: Recurrent Processing Promotes Robust Object Recognition when Objects Are Degraded
Author(s) -
Dean Wyatte,
Tim Curran,
Randall C. O’Reilly
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal of cognitive neuroscience
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.597
H-Index - 214
eISSN - 1530-8898
pISSN - 0898-929X
DOI - 10.1162/jocn_a_00282
Subject(s) - backward masking , masking (illustration) , cognitive neuroscience of visual object recognition , contrast (vision) , categorization , artificial intelligence , feed forward , computer science , computer vision , clutter , psychology , pattern recognition (psychology) , speech recognition , object (grammar) , neuroscience , perception , art , telecommunications , radar , control engineering , engineering , visual arts
Everyday vision requires robustness to a myriad of environmental factors that degrade stimuli. Foreground clutter can occlude objects of interest, and complex lighting and shadows can decrease the contrast of items. How does the brain recognize visual objects despite these low-quality inputs? On the basis of predictions from a model of object recognition that contains excitatory feedback, we hypothesized that recurrent processing would promote robust recognition when objects were degraded by strengthening bottom-up signals that were weakened because of occlusion and contrast reduction. To test this hypothesis, we used backward masking to interrupt the processing of partially occluded and contrast reduced images during a categorization experiment. As predicted by the model, we found significant interactions between the mask and occlusion and the mask and contrast, such that the recognition of heavily degraded stimuli was differentially impaired by masking. The model provided a close fit of these results in an isomorphic version of the experiment with identical stimuli. The model also provided an intuitive explanation of the interactions between the mask and degradations, indicating that masking interfered specifically with the extensive recurrent processing necessary to amplify and resolve highly degraded inputs, whereas less degraded inputs did not require much amplification and could be rapidly resolved, making them less susceptible to masking. Together, the results of the experiment and the accompanying model simulations illustrate the limits of feedforward vision and suggest that object recognition is better characterized as a highly interactive, dynamic process that depends on the coordination of multiple brain areas.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom