The Rarity of Realpolitik: What Bismarck's Rationality Reveals about International Politics
Author(s) -
Brian C. Rathbun
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
international security
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.69
H-Index - 106
eISSN - 1531-4804
pISSN - 0162-2889
DOI - 10.1162/isec_a_00323
Subject(s) - realpolitik , rationality , deliberation , political science , foreign policy , international relations , state (computer science) , politics , positive economics , epistemology , law , philosophy , economics , computer science , algorithm
Realpolitik, the pursuit of vital state interests in a dangerous world that constrains state behavior, is at the heart of realist theory. All realists assume either that states engage in such behavior or, at the very least, are highly incentivized to do so by the structure of the international system. Classical realists remind us, however, that Realpolitik presupposes rational thinking, which should not be taken for granted. Some leaders act more rationally than others because they think more rationally than others. Research in cognitive psychology provides a strong foundation for classical realist claims that Realpolitik requires a commitment to objectivity and deliberation, a particular psychology that few leaders exhibit. A case study of Otto von Bismarck's role in German reunification demonstrates that rationality is the exception, rather than the norm. Even though Prussia was under enormous structural constraints that should have incentivized Realpolitik, the man who would become the Iron Chancellor was isolated because of his foreign policy views. Bismarck consistently disagreed with conservative patrons and allies at home, disagreements that can be reduced largely to his higher degree of rationality.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom