z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Leaders and Laggards: Climate Policy Ambition in Developed States
Author(s) -
Paul Tobin
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
global environmental politics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.555
H-Index - 56
eISSN - 1536-0091
pISSN - 1526-3800
DOI - 10.1162/glep_a_00433
Subject(s) - qualitative comparative analysis , per capita , general partnership , corporate governance , elite , climate change , climate policy , political science , government (linguistics) , state (computer science) , politics , economics , sociology , ecology , population , linguistics , statistics , philosophy , demography , mathematics , finance , algorithm , computer science , law , biology
In 1992 the United Nations identified twenty-four “Annex II” states as being “developed” and holding the greatest responsibility for reducing emissions. Since then, the ambitions of these states toward mitigating climate change have varied significantly. This article is the first to employ fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to analyze climate policy variation among the Annex II developed states. The presence of a left-wing government is shown to be sufficient for ambitious climate policy, as is having high GDP per capita in conjunction with close links to the EU and few political constraints. The analysis highlights Austria’s surprisingly unambitious climate policy, which is explained, following elite interviews, by the state’s unique social partnership governance model and unusual fuel tourism industry. Overall, fsQCA proves a useful method for examining variables in combination and for case study selection, although limited by the number of variables it can assess.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom