2 Indicator-Based Multiobjective Search
Author(s) -
Dimo Brockhoff,
Tobias Wagner,
Heike Trautmann
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
evolutionary computation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.732
H-Index - 82
eISSN - 1530-9304
pISSN - 1063-6560
DOI - 10.1162/evco_a_00135
Subject(s) - multi objective optimization , mathematical optimization , set (abstract data type) , performance indicator , computer science , distribution (mathematics) , pareto principle , evolutionary algorithm , mathematics , mathematical analysis , programming language , management , economics
In multiobjective optimization, set-based performance indicators are commonly used to assess the quality of a Pareto front approximation. Based on the scalarization obtained by these indicators, a performance comparison of multiobjective optimization algorithms becomes possible. The R2 and the hypervolume (HV) indicator represent two recommended approaches which have shown a correlated behavior in recent empirical studies. Whereas the HV indicator has been comprehensively analyzed in the last years, almost no studies on the R2 indicator exist. In this extended version of our previous conference paper, we thus perform a comprehensive investigation of the properties of the R2 indicator in a theoretical and empirical way. The influence of the number and distribution of the weight vectors on the optimal distribution of μ solutions is analyzed. Based on a comparative analysis, specific characteristics and differences of the R2 and HV indicator are presented. Furthermore, the R2 indicator is integrated into an indicator-based steady-state evolutionary multiobjective optimization algorithm (EMOA). It is shown that the so-called R2-EMOA can accurately approximate the optimal distribution of μ solutions regarding R2.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom