Stroke Acute Management and Outcomes During the COVID-19 Outbreak
Author(s) -
Blanca Fuentes,
María Alonso de Leciñana,
Sebastián GarcíaMadrona,
Fernando DíazOtero,
Clara Aguirre,
Patricia Calleja,
J. Egido,
Joaquín Carneado Ruiz,
Gerardo RuizAres,
Jorge RodríguezPardo,
Ángela RodríguezLópez,
Álvaro XiménezCarrillo,
Alicia de Felipe,
Fernando Ostos,
Guillermo GonzálezOrtega,
P. Simal,
Carlos I. Gómez Escalonilla,
Pablo GómezPorro,
Zayrho Desanvicente,
Gemma Reig,
Antonio Gil-Núñez,
Jaime Masjuán,
Exuperio Díez–Tejedor
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
stroke
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.397
H-Index - 319
eISSN - 1524-4628
pISSN - 0039-2499
DOI - 10.1161/strokeaha.120.031769
Subject(s) - medicine , stroke (engine) , covid-19 , acute stroke , outbreak , retrospective cohort study , emergency medicine , odds ratio , cohort , pandemic , cohort study , pediatrics , disease , pathology , infectious disease (medical specialty) , mechanical engineering , tissue plasminogen activator , engineering
Background and Purpose: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has added challenges to providing quality acute stroke care due to the reallocation of stroke resources to COVID-19. Case series suggest that patients with COVID-19 have more severe strokes; however, no large series have compared stroke outcomes with contemporary non–COVID-19 patients. Purpose was to analyze the impact of COVID-19 pandemic in stroke care and to evaluate stroke outcomes according to the diagnosis of COVID-19. Methods: Retrospective multicenter cohort study including consecutive acute stroke patients admitted to 7 stroke centers from February 25 to April 25, 2020 (first 2 months of the COVID-19 outbreak in Madrid). The quality of stroke care was measured by the number of admissions, recanalization treatments, and time metrics. The primary outcome was death or dependence at discharge. Results: A total of 550 acute stroke patients were admitted. A significant reduction in the number of admissions and secondary interhospital transfers was found. COVID-19 was confirmed in 105 (19.1%) patients, and a further 19 patients were managed as suspected COVID-19 (3.5%). No differences were found in the rates of reperfusion therapies in ischemic strokes (45.5% non–COVID-19, 35.7% confirmed COVID-19, and 40% suspected COVID-19;P =0.265). However, the COVID-19 group had longer median door-to-puncture time (110 versus 80 minutes), which was associated with the performance of chest computed tomography. Multivariate analysis confirmed poorer outcomes for confirmed or suspected COVID-19 (adjusted odds ratios, 2.05 [95% CI, 1.12–3.76] and 3.56 [95% CI, 1.15–11.05], respectively).Conclusions: This study confirms that patients with COVID-19 have more severe strokes and poorer outcomes despite similar acute management. A well-established stroke care network helps to diminish the impact of such an outbreak in stroke care, reducing secondary transfers and allowing maintenance of reperfusion therapies, with a minor impact on door-to-puncture times, which were longer in patients who underwent chest computed tomography.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom