z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Non–Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Prior Gastrointestinal Bleeding
Author(s) -
Soonil Kwon,
SoRyoung Lee,
EueKeun Choi,
Euijae Lee,
JinHyung Jung,
Kyungdo Han,
MyungJin Cha,
Seil Oh,
Gregory Y.H. Lip
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
stroke
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.397
H-Index - 319
eISSN - 1524-4628
pISSN - 0039-2499
DOI - 10.1161/strokeaha.120.030761
Subject(s) - medicine , atrial fibrillation , warfarin , hazard ratio , vitamin k antagonist , gastrointestinal bleeding , stroke (engine) , edoxaban , dabigatran , cardiology , anticoagulant , proportional hazards model , confidence interval , mechanical engineering , engineering
Background and Purpose: Limited data support the benefits of non–vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) among atrial fibrillation patients with prior gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB). We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of NOACs compared with those of warfarin among atrial fibrillation patients with prior GIB. Methods: Oral anticoagulant–naive individuals with atrial fibrillation and prior GIB between January 2010 and April 2018 were identified from the Korean claims database. NOAC users were compared with warfarin users by balancing covariates using the inverse probability of treatment weighting method. The primary outcomes were ischemic stroke, major bleeding, and the composite outcome (combined ischemic stroke and major bleeding). Fatal events from each outcome were evaluated as secondary outcomes. Results: A total of 42 048 patients were included (24 781 in the NOAC group and 17 267 in the warfarin group). The mean time from prior GIB to the initiation of oral anticoagulant was 3.1±2.6 years. After inverse probability of treatment weighting, baseline characteristics were balanced between the two groups (mean age, 72 years; men, 56.8%; and mean CHA2 DS2 -VASc score, 3.7). Lower risks of ischemic stroke, major bleeding, and the composite outcome were associated with NOAC use than with warfarin use (weighted hazard ratio, 0.608 [95% CI, 0.543–0.680]; hazard ratio, 0.731 [95% CI, 0.642–0.832]; and hazard ratio, 0.661 [95% CI, 0.606–0.721], respectively). For all secondary outcomes, NOACs showed greater risk reductions compared with warfarin.Conclusions: NOACs were associated with lower risks of ischemic stroke and major bleeding than warfarin among atrial fibrillation patients with prior GIB.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom