z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Intraarterial Versus Intravenous Tirofiban as an Adjunct to Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Author(s) -
Jianhong Yang,
Yuefei Wu,
Xiang Gao,
Andrew Bivard,
Christopher Levi,
Mark Parsons,
Longting Lin,
Neil J. Spratt,
Carlos García-Esperón,
Ferdinand Miteff,
Philip Choi,
Timothy Kleining,
Billy O’Brien,
Kenneth Butcher,
Qiang Dong,
Xin Cheng,
Min Lou,
Congguo Yin,
Peng Wang,
Yu Geng,
Xu Zhang,
Xuezhi Yang,
Weiwen Qiu,
Qi Fang,
Yi Sui,
Wenhuo Chen,
Gang Li
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
stroke
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.397
H-Index - 319
eISSN - 1524-4628
pISSN - 0039-2499
DOI - 10.1161/strokeaha.120.029994
Subject(s) - medicine , tirofiban , stroke (engine) , adjunct , acute stroke , ischemic stroke , anesthesia , thrombolysis , cardiology , surgery , ischemia , myocardial infarction , tissue plasminogen activator , percutaneous coronary intervention , mechanical engineering , engineering , linguistics , philosophy
Background and Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the treatment effect of intraarterial versus intravenous tirofiban during endovascular thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke. Methods: This study retrospectively examined 503 patients with acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion who received endovascular thrombectomy within 24 hours of stroke onset. Patients were divided into 3 groups: no tirofiban (n=354), intraarterial tirofiban (n=79), and intravenous tirofiban (n=70). The 3 groups were compared in terms of recanalization rate, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, in-hospital death rate, 3-month death, and 3-month outcomes measured by modified Rankin Scale score (good clinical outcome of 0–2, poor outcome of 5–6). The comparison was statistically assessed by propensity score matching, followed by Freidman rank-sum test and pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni correction. Results: The propensity score matching resulted in 92 matched triplets. Compared with the no-tirofiban group, the intravenous tirofiban group showed significantly increased recanalization (96.7% versus 64.1%,P <0.001), an increased rate of 3-month good outcome (69.5% versus 51.2%,P =0.034), and a lower rate of 3-month poor outcome (12.2% versus 41.4%,P <0.001). There was no significant difference between the tirofiban intravenous and no-tirofiban groups in terms of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (2.2% versus 0%,P =1.000). However, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage was significantly increased in the intraarterial-tirofiban group compared with the no-tirofiban group (19.1% versus 0%,P <0.001), with an increased rate of in-hospital death (23.6% versus 0%P <0.001), and increased rate of 3-month death (26.8% versus 11.1%,P =0.021). The intraarterial-tirofiban and no-tirofiban group showed no significant difference in recanalization rate (66.3% versus 64.1%,P =1.000).Conclusions: As an adjunct to endovascular thrombectomy, intravenous tirofiban is associated with high recanalization rate and good outcome, whereas intraarterial tirofiban is associated with high hemorrhagic rate and death rate.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom