z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Urban-Rural Inequities in Acute Stroke Care and In-Hospital Mortality
Author(s) -
Gmerice Hammond,
Alina A. Luke,
Lauren Elson,
Amytis Towfighi,
Karen E. Joynt Maddox
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
stroke
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.397
H-Index - 319
eISSN - 1524-4628
pISSN - 0039-2499
DOI - 10.1161/strokeaha.120.029318
Subject(s) - medicine , stroke (engine) , rurality , thrombolysis , rural area , odds ratio , odds , residence , demography , medicaid , emergency medicine , health care , logistic regression , myocardial infarction , mechanical engineering , pathology , sociology , engineering , economics , economic growth
Background and Purpose: The rural-urban life-expectancy gap is widening, but underlying causes are incompletely understood. Prior studies suggest stroke care may be worse for individuals in more rural areas, and technological advancements in stroke care may disproportionately impact individuals in more rural areas. We sought to examine differences and 5-year trends in the care and outcomes of patients hospitalized for stroke across rural-urban strata. Methods: Retrospective cohort study using National Inpatient Sample data from 2012 to 2017. Rurality was classified by county of residence according to the 6-strata National Center for Health Statistics classification scheme. Results: There were 792 054 hospitalizations for acute stroke in our sample. Rural patients were more often white (78% versus 49%), older than 75 (44% versus 40%), and in the lowest quartile of income (59% versus 32%) compared with urban patients. Among patients with acute ischemic stroke, intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular therapy use were lower for rural compared with urban patients (intravenous thrombolysis: 4.2% versus 9.2%, adjusted odds ratio, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.51–0.59],P <0.001; endovascular therapy: 1.63% versus 2.41%, adjusted odds ratio, 0.64 [0.57–0.73],P <0.001). Urban-rural gaps in both therapies persisted from 2012 to 2017. Overall, stroke mortality was higher in rural than urban areas (6.87% versus 5.82%,P <0.001). Adjusted in-patient mortality rates increased across categories of increasing rurality (suburban, 0.97 [0.94–1.0],P =0.086; large towns, 1.05 [1.01–1.09],P =0.009; small towns, 1.10 [1.06–1.15],P <0.001; micropolitan rural, 1.16 [1.11–1.21],P <0.001; and remote rural 1.21 [1.15–1.27],P <0.001 compared with urban patients. Mortality for rural patients compared with urban patients did not improve from 2012 (adjusted odds ratio, 1.12 [1.00–1.26],P <0.001) to 2017 (adjusted odds ratio, 1.27 [1.13–1.42],P <0.001).Conclusions: Rural patients with stroke were less likely to receive intravenous thrombolysis or endovascular therapy and had higher in-hospital mortality than their urban counterparts. These gaps did not improve over time. Enhancing access to evidence-based stroke care may be a target for reducing rural-urban disparities.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom