Effects of a Feedback-Demanding Stroke Clock on Acute Stroke Management
Author(s) -
Mathias Fousse,
Daniel Grúň,
Stefan A. Helwig,
Silke Walter,
Adam Bekhit,
Stefan Wagenpfeil,
Martin Lesmeister,
Michael Kettner,
Safwan Roumia,
Ruben MühlBenninghaus,
Andreas Simgen,
Umut Yılmaz,
Christian Ruckes,
Kai Kronfeld,
Monika Bachhuber,
Iris Q. Grunwald,
Thomas Bertsch,
Wolfgang Reith,
Klaus Faßbender
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
stroke
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.397
H-Index - 319
eISSN - 1524-4628
pISSN - 0039-2499
DOI - 10.1161/strokeaha.120.029222
Subject(s) - medicine , thrombolysis , stroke (engine) , modified rankin scale , neurological examination , randomized controlled trial , fibrinolytic agent , clinical endpoint , emergency medicine , surgery , radiology , anesthesia , tissue plasminogen activator , ischemic stroke , ischemia , mechanical engineering , myocardial infarction , engineering
Background and Purpose: This randomized study aimed to evaluate whether the use of a stroke clock demanding active feedback from the stroke physician accelerates acute stroke management. Methods: For this randomized controlled study, a large-display alarm clock was installed in the computed tomography room, where admission, diagnostic work-up, and intravenous thrombolysis occurred. Alarms were set at the following target times after admission: (1) 15 minutes (neurological examination completed); (2) 25 minutes (computed tomography scanning and international normalized ratio determination by point-of-care laboratory completed); and (3) 30 minutes (intravenous thrombolysis started). The responsible stroke physician had to actively provide feedback by pressing a buzzer button. The alarm could be avoided by pressing the button before time out. Times to therapy decision (primary end point, defined as the end of all diagnostic work-up required for decision for or against recanalizing treatment), neurological examination, imaging, point-of-care laboratory, needle, and groin puncture were assessed by a neutral observer. Functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale) was assessed at day 90. Results: Of 107 participants, 51 stroke clock patients exhibited better stroke-management metrics than 56 control patients. Times from door to (1) end of all indicated diagnostic work-up (treatment decision time; 16.73 versus 26.00 minutes,P <0.001), (2) end of neurological examination (7.28 versus 10.00 minutes,P <0.001), (3) end of computed tomography (11.17 versus 14.00 minutes,P =0.002), (4) end of computed tomography angiography (14.00 versus 17.17 minutes,P =0.001), (5) end of point-of-care laboratory testing (12.14 versus 20.00 minutes,P <0.001), and (6) needle times (18.83 versus 47.00 minutes,P =0.016) were improved. In contrast, door-to-groin puncture times and functional outcomes at day 90 were not significantly different.Conclusions: This study showed that the use of a stroke clock demanding active feedback significantly improves acute stroke-management metrics and, thus, represents a potential low-cost strategy for streamlining time-sensitive stroke treatment.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom