z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Evaluation of Diffusion Lesion Volume Measurements in Acute Ischemic Stroke Using Encoder-Decoder Convolutional Network
Author(s) -
YoonChul Kim,
Ji Eun Lee,
Inwu Yu,
Ha-Na Song,
In-Young Baek,
JoonKyung Seong,
HanGil Jeong,
Beom Joon Kim,
Hyo Suk Nam,
JongWon Chung,
Oh Young Bang,
GyeongMoon Kim,
WooKeun Seo
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
stroke
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.397
H-Index - 319
eISSN - 1524-4628
pISSN - 0039-2499
DOI - 10.1161/strokeaha.118.024261
Subject(s) - medicine , stroke (engine) , lesion , acute stroke , cardiology , diffusion , ischemic stroke , volume (thermodynamics) , clinical neurology , radiology , surgery , ischemia , neuroscience , physics , quantum mechanics , biology , tissue plasminogen activator , thermodynamics , mechanical engineering , engineering
Background and Purpose— Automatic segmentation of cerebral infarction on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is typically performed based on a fixed apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) threshold. Fixed ADC threshold methods may not be accurate because ADC values vary over time after stroke onset. Deep learning has the potential to improve the accuracy, provided that a large set of correctly annotated lesion data is used for training. The purpose of this study was to evaluate deep learning–based methods and compare them with commercial software in terms of lesion volume measurements. Methods— U-net, an encoder-decoder convolutional neural network, was adopted to train segmentation models. Two U-net models were developed: a U-net (DWI+ADC) model, trained on DWI and ADC data, and a U-net (DWI) model, trained on DWI data only. A total of 296 subjects were used for training and 134 for external validation. An expert neurologist manually delineated the stroke lesions on DWI images, which were used as the ground-truth reference. Lesion volume measurements from the U-net methods were compared against the expert’s manual segmentation and Rapid Processing of Perfusion and Diffusion (RAPID; iSchemaView Inc) analysis. Results— In external validation, U-net (DWI+ADC) showed the highest intraclass correlation coefficient with manual segmentation (intraclass correlation coefficient, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.99–1.00) and sufficiently high correlation with the RAPID results (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.98–0.99). U-net (DWI+ADC) and manual segmentation resulted in the smallest 95% Bland-Altman limits of agreement (−5.31 to 4.93 mL) with a mean difference of −0.19 mL. Conclusions— The presented deep learning–based method is fully automatic and shows a high correlation of diffusion lesion volume measurements with manual segmentation and commercial software. The method has the potential to be used in patient selection for endovascular reperfusion therapy in the late time window of acute stroke.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom