Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale Versus Medical Therapy in Patients With Cryptogenic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack
Author(s) -
George Ntaios,
Vasileios Papavasileiou,
Dimitrios Sagris,
Konstantinos Makaritsis,
Konstantinos Vemmos,
Thorsten Steiner,
Patrik Michel
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
stroke
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.397
H-Index - 319
eISSN - 1524-4628
pISSN - 0039-2499
DOI - 10.1161/strokeaha.117.020030
Subject(s) - medicine , patent foramen ovale , stroke (engine) , odds ratio , paradoxical embolism , confidence interval , myocardial infarction , atrial fibrillation , cardiology , embolism , randomized controlled trial , surgery , migraine , mechanical engineering , engineering
Previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses compared the efficacy and safety of patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure versus medical treatment in patients with cryptogenic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). Recently, new evidence from randomized trials became available.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom