Comparison of the 2 Most Popular Deconvolution Techniques for the Detection of Penumbral Flow in Acute Stroke
Author(s) -
Olivier ZaroWeber,
Michelle Livne,
Steve Z. Martin,
Federico C. von SamsonHimmelstjerna,
Walter MoellerHartmann,
Alexander K. Schuster,
Peter Brunecker,
Wolf-Dieter Heiß,
Jan Sobesky,
Vince I. Madai
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
stroke
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.397
H-Index - 319
eISSN - 1524-4628
pISSN - 0039-2499
DOI - 10.1161/strokeaha.115.010246
Subject(s) - medicine , deconvolution , penumbra , nuclear medicine , magnetic resonance imaging , receiver operating characteristic , cerebral blood flow , stroke (engine) , positron emission tomography , acute stroke , nuclear magnetic resonance , radiology , mathematics , physics , algorithm , ischemia , thermodynamics , tissue plasminogen activator
Dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced (DSC) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used to identify the tissue-at-risk in acute stroke, but the choice of optimal DSC postprocessing in the clinical setting remains a matter of debate. Using 15O-water positron emission tomography (PET), we validated the performance of 2 common deconvolution methods for DSC-MRI.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom