Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Mismatch Criteria to Select Patients for Endovascular Stroke Therapy | Zendy

Nishant K. Mishra | Zendy; Gregory W. Albers | Zendy; Sören Christensen | Zendy; Michael P. Marks | Zendy; Scott Hamilton | Zendy; Matús Straka | Zendy; John Liggins | Zendy; Stephanie Kemp | Zendy; Michael Mlynash | Zendy; Roland Bammer | Zendy; Maarten G. Lansberg | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Mismatch Criteria to Select Patients for Endovascular Stroke Therapy

Author(s) -

Nishant K. Mishra,

Gregory W. Albers,

Sören Christensen,

Michael P. Marks,

Scott Hamilton,

Matús Straka,

John Liggins,

Stephanie Kemp,

Michael Mlynash,

Roland Bammer,

Maarten G. Lansberg

Publication year - 2014

Publication title -

stroke

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 3.397

H-Index - 319

eISSN - 1524-4628

pISSN - 0039-2499

DOI - 10.1161/strokeaha.114.004772

Subject(s) - medicine , odds ratio , magnetic resonance imaging , magnetic resonance angiography , confidence interval , stroke (engine) , perfusion scanning , radiology , perfusion , occlusion , mechanical engineering , engineering

The Diffusion and Perfusion Imaging Evaluation for Understanding Stroke Evolution 2 (DEFUSE 2) study has shown that clinical response to endovascular reperfusion differs between patients with and without perfusion-diffusion (perfusion-weighted imaging-diffusion-weighted imaging, PWI-DWI) mismatch: patients with mismatch have a favorable clinical response to reperfusion, whereas patients without mismatch do not. This study examined whether alternative mismatch criteria can also differentiate patients according to their response to reperfusion.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research