Failure of Cerebral Hemodynamic Selection in General or of Specific Positron Emission Tomography Methodology? | Zendy

Andrew P. Carlson | Zendy; Howard Yonas | Zendy; YueFang Chang | Zendy; Edwin M. Nemoto | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Failure of Cerebral Hemodynamic Selection in General or of Specific Positron Emission Tomography Methodology?

Author(s) -

Andrew P. Carlson,

Howard Yonas,

YueFang Chang,

Edwin M. Nemoto

Publication year - 2011

Publication title -

stroke

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 3.397

H-Index - 319

eISSN - 1524-4628

pISSN - 0039-2499

DOI - 10.1161/strokeaha.111.627745

Subject(s) - medicine , positron emission tomography , hemodynamics , nuclear medicine , gold standard (test) , ischemia , occlusion , selection (genetic algorithm) , cardiology , anesthesia , artificial intelligence , computer science

The Carotid Occlusion Surgery Study (COSS) was an improvement over the Extracranial-Intracranial Bypass Study, which did not utilize physiological selection. To assess possible reasons for early closure of the COSS trial, we reviewed COSS methods used to identify high-risk patients and compared results with separate quantitative data.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research