Foot Drop Stimulation Versus Ankle Foot Orthosis After Stroke | Zendy

Patricia M. Kluding | Zendy; Kari Dunning | Zendy; Michael W. OʼDell | Zendy; Samuel S. Wu | Zendy; Jivan Ginosian | Zendy; Jody Feld | Zendy; Keith McBride | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Foot Drop Stimulation Versus Ankle Foot Orthosis After Stroke

Author(s) -

Patricia M. Kluding,

Kari Dunning,

Michael W. OʼDell,

Samuel S. Wu,

Jivan Ginosian,

Jody Feld,

Keith McBride

Publication year - 2013

Publication title -

stroke

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 3.397

H-Index - 319

eISSN - 1524-4628

pISSN - 0039-2499

DOI - 10.1161/strokeaha.111.000334

Subject(s) - medicine , foot drop , physical medicine and rehabilitation , functional electrical stimulation , randomized controlled trial , gait , foot (prosody) , physical therapy , stroke (engine) , preferred walking speed , confidence interval , ankle , clinical trial , surgery , stimulation , mechanical engineering , linguistics , philosophy , engineering

Drop foot after stroke may be addressed using an ankle foot orthosis (AFO) or a foot drop stimulator (FDS). The Functional Ambulation: Standard Treatment versus Electric Stimulation Therapy (FASTEST) trial was a multicenter, randomized, single-blinded trial comparing FDS and AFO for drop foot among people ≥ 3 months after stroke with gait speed ≤ 0.8 m/s.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research