z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Anticoagulation Should Not Be Used in Most Patients With Stroke With Infective Endocarditis
Author(s) -
Cathy Sila
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
stroke
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.397
H-Index - 319
eISSN - 1524-4628
pISSN - 0039-2499
DOI - 10.1161/strokeaha.110.611699
Subject(s) - medicine , infective endocarditis , stroke (engine) , endocarditis , complication , pediatrics , surgery , mechanical engineering , engineering
One of the most worrisome consults to the stroke service is the patient with neurological symptoms in the setting of infective endocarditis (IE). Stroke is the main neurological complication of IE and in 50% to 75% is the presenting feature. The most effective strategy for the prevention of a first or recurrent stroke is the prompt institution of appropriate antibiotic therapy, which reduces the risk to 1% to 3% within the first week.1 Ischemic stroke is 3-fold more common than hemorrhagic stroke. Embolic patterns are seen on diffusion-weighted MR in 92% of patients with stroke or encephalopathy. Initiating anticoagulation may seem reasonable to prevent embolization of infected or bland platelet–fibrin valvular vegetations—perhaps enhanced in the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies—and it is the standard of care for most cardioembolic stroke; however, the stroke risk is similar in the presence or absence of anticoagulants at onset of IE. The most compelling reason to avoid anticoagulation in Staphylococcus aureus IE is the predominance of early …

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom