Safety of Stenting and Endarterectomy by Symptomatic Status in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stenting Trial (CREST) | Zendy

Frank L. Silver | Zendy; Ariane Mackey | Zendy; Wayne M. Clark | Zendy; William H. Brooks | Zendy; Carlos H. Timaran | Zendy; David Chiu | Zendy; Larry B. Goldstein | Zendy; James F. Meschia | Zendy; R. Ferguson | Zendy; Wesley S. Moore | Zendy; George Howard | Zendy; Thomas G. Brott | Zendy

Open Access

Safety of Stenting and Endarterectomy by Symptomatic Status in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stenting Trial (CREST)

Author(s) -

Frank L. Silver,

Ariane Mackey,

Wayne M. Clark,

William H. Brooks,

Carlos H. Timaran,

David Chiu,

Larry B. Goldstein,

James F. Meschia,

R. Ferguson,

Wesley S. Moore,

George Howard,

Thomas G. Brott

Publication year - 2011

Publication title -

stroke

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 3.397

H-Index - 319

eISSN - 1524-4628

pISSN - 0039-2499

DOI - 10.1161/strokeaha.110.610212

Subject(s) - medicine , hazard ratio , stroke (engine) , asymptomatic , carotid endarterectomy , myocardial infarction , carotid stenting , endarterectomy , cardiology , surgery , revascularization , stenosis , confidence interval , mechanical engineering , engineering

The safety of carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has varied by symptomatic status in previous trials. The Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stenting Trial (CREST) data were analyzed to determine safety in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research