Clinical and Radiological Courses Do Not Differ Between Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery-Positive and Negative Patients With Stroke After Thrombolysis | Zendy

Martin Ebinger | Zendy; AnnChristin Ostwaldt | Zendy; Ivana Galinović | Zendy; Michał Różański | Zendy; Peter Brunecker | Zendy; Christian H. Nolte | Zendy; Matthias Endres | Zendy; Jochen B. Fiebach | Zendy

Open Access

Clinical and Radiological Courses Do Not Differ Between Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery-Positive and Negative Patients With Stroke After Thrombolysis

Author(s) -

Martin Ebinger,

AnnChristin Ostwaldt,

Ivana Galinović,

Michał Różański,

Peter Brunecker,

Christian H. Nolte,

Matthias Endres,

Jochen B. Fiebach

Publication year - 2010

Publication title -

stroke

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 3.397

H-Index - 319

eISSN - 1524-4628

pISSN - 0039-2499

DOI - 10.1161/strokeaha.110.583971

Subject(s) - interquartile range , fluid attenuated inversion recovery , medicine , thrombolysis , stroke (engine) , modified rankin scale , nuclear medicine , magnetic resonance imaging , radiology , surgery , ischemic stroke , ischemia , myocardial infarction , mechanical engineering , engineering

After acute ischemic stroke, the proportion of patients with detectable lesions on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MRI sequences increases over time. We investigated whether thrombolysis was less effective in FLAIR-positive versus -negative patients.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research