z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
How to Improve the Quality of a Clinical Trial on Traditional Chinese Medicine for Stroke
Author(s) -
Bo Wu,
Ming Liu
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
stroke
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.397
H-Index - 319
eISSN - 1524-4628
pISSN - 0039-2499
DOI - 10.1161/strokeaha.109.563072
Subject(s) - medicine , stroke (engine) , traditional chinese medicine , clinical trial , quality of life (healthcare) , china , randomized controlled trial , neurology , alternative medicine , physical therapy , nursing , psychiatry , mechanical engineering , pathology , engineering , political science , law
To the Editor:In the August issue of Stroke , Zhang and colleagues1 took on the tremendous task to present a systematic review of the efficacy of complex Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) for stroke. The authors have included 34 randomized, controlled trials and quasi-randomized, controlled trials, which had assessed the effect of complex TCM on motor dysfunction after a stroke. In a quite appropriate way, they have chosen death, activities of daily living, functional recovery, and quality of life as outcome criteria. They correctly stress the poor methodological quality of almost all the trials selected for the review. The participants involved in these trials were patients who had either an ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. The time from stroke onset to the trial inclusion was highly variable. The heterogenous interventions included complex TCM, acupuncture, herbal medicine, Western medicine, and physical exercise. “Effective rate” was defined as a primary outcome measure in almost all the trials. All trials …

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom