Responsiveness and Validity of Three Outcome Measures of Motor Function After Stroke Rehabilitation | Zendy

YuWei Hsieh | Zendy; ChingYi Wu | Zendy; Kehchung Lin | Zendy; Ya-fen Chang | Zendy; ChiaLing Chen | Zendy; JungSen Liu | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Responsiveness and Validity of Three Outcome Measures of Motor Function After Stroke Rehabilitation

Author(s) -

YuWei Hsieh,

ChingYi Wu,

Kehchung Lin,

Ya-fen Chang,

ChiaLing Chen,

JungSen Liu

Publication year - 2009

Publication title -

stroke

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 3.397

H-Index - 319

eISSN - 1524-4628

pISSN - 0039-2499

DOI - 10.1161/strokeaha.108.530584

Subject(s) - construct validity , medicine , rehabilitation , functional independence measure , predictive validity , physical therapy , criterion validity , stroke (engine) , rank correlation , physical medicine and rehabilitation , concurrent validity , motor function , wilcoxon signed rank test , mann–whitney u test , spearman's rank correlation coefficient , psychometrics , clinical psychology , statistics , mechanical engineering , mathematics , engineering , internal consistency

This study investigated and compared the responsiveness and validity of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), and the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) for patients after stroke rehabilitation.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research