The Ethics of Thrombolytic Trials Beyond 3 (or 4.5) Hours
Author(s) -
Geoffrey A. Donnan,
Stephen M. Davis
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
stroke
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.397
H-Index - 319
eISSN - 1524-4628
pISSN - 0039-2499
DOI - 10.1161/strokeaha.108.520684
Subject(s) - medicine , clinical trial , clinical practice , randomized controlled trial , aspirin , thrombolysis , family medicine , surgery , myocardial infarction
For several decades, clinicians across all fields of internal medicine have embraced the concept of practice guidelines based on levels of evidence. Medical practice in our careers has been transformed from opinion-driven behavior to a reliance on carefully assessed evidence, ranked according to its strength. Ultimately, we expect level 1 evidence for any new therapy, namely adequately powered and conducted randomized, prospective clinical trials. This has facilitated a universal benchmark for clinical practice throughout the world, with only minor regional variations. In acute stroke, this has led to the recommended use of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator within 3 hours, aspirin within 48 hours, management in stroke care units, and, more recently, hemicraniectomy in selected cases of malignant cerebral edema.1How, then, does this principle apply to the …
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom