Explicit Priority Setting in Clinical Guidelines | Zendy

Peter Langhorne | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Explicit Priority Setting in Clinical Guidelines

Author(s) -

Peter Langhorne

Publication year - 2007

Publication title -

stroke

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 3.397

H-Index - 319

eISSN - 1524-4628

pISSN - 0039-2499

DOI - 10.1161/strokeaha.107.487231

Subject(s) - medicine , guideline , grading (engineering) , context (archaeology) , evidence based medicine , clinical practice , health care , medline , medical education , alternative medicine , family medicine , pathology , paleontology , economics , biology , economic growth , civil engineering , political science , law , engineering

See related article, pages 2185–2190. The last 15 years have seen great improvements in the development of clinical practice guidelines. There are now rigorous methods for conducting systematic reviews of the relevant scientific evidence and for grading the strength of that evidence.1 However, it is in the next step of the process (generating and implementing recommendations for practice) that difficulties frequently arise. The grade of scientific evidence cannot simply dictate …

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research