Carotid Artery Stenting: Verdict Still Pending
Author(s) -
Paola De Rango,
Piergiorgio Cao,
Valeria Caso
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
stroke
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.397
H-Index - 319
eISSN - 1524-4628
pISSN - 0039-2499
DOI - 10.1161/strokeaha.107.486084
Subject(s) - medicine , verdict , carotid endarterectomy , carotid arteries , stroke (engine) , stenosis , endarterectomy , general surgery , surgery , cardiology , law , mechanical engineering , political science , engineering
To the Editor:In their recent article, Derdeyn et al1 reviewed existing data for carotid artery stenting (CAS) in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis and concluded that there is no role for CAS in patients with low surgical risk and no proven benefit from carotid endarterectomy (CEA). These conclusions are categorical and strong against CAS without any possibility of “appellation” but are based on confusing data selected from literature. There are many unresolved questions in this article.The authors exclusively analyzed results from nonrandomized industry-sponsored investigational device exemption (IDE) studies, most of which specifically focusing on high-risk subgroups (ARCHeR, BEACH, SECurity). These studies were reported as existing data about CAS in “low surgical risk patients” and they …
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom