z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Do We Really Need a Better Way to Give Heparin in Acute Cerebral Ischemia?
Author(s) -
Robert G. Hart,
J. Donald Easton
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
stroke
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.397
H-Index - 319
eISSN - 1524-4628
pISSN - 0039-2499
DOI - 10.1161/str.33.3.659
Subject(s) - medicine , ischemia , heparin , acute stroke , stroke (engine) , intensive care medicine , cardiology , tissue plasminogen activator , mechanical engineering , engineering
In the early 1980s, we assiduously followed management guidelines advocating intravenous heparin for patients within 2 months of transient ischemic attack (TIA) and for most patients with acute ischemic stroke. Heparin flowed freely; there were always 2 to 3 patients receiving it on the neurology ward and a dozen partial thromboplastin times were urgently checked each day. Times have changed. High standards of evidence are expected to support management recommendations, grounded firmly in randomized clinical trials rather than traditional GOBSAT methods (Good Old Boys Sat At Table).1 Nine randomized trials have tested intravenous unfractionated heparin or related agents in acute stroke.2 Critical analysis of the accumulated evidence does “not support the routine use of any type of anticoagulant in acute ischemic stroke.”2 It is clear that intravenous heparin …

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom