z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Global Longitudinal Strain is Incremental to Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction for the Prediction of Outcome in Optimally Treated Dilated Cardiomyopathy Patients
Author(s) -
Anne G. Raafs,
Andrea Boscutti,
Michiel T.H.M. Henkens,
Wout W. A. van den Broek,
Job A.J. Verdonschot,
Jerremy Weerts,
Davide Stolfo,
Vincenzo Nuzzi,
Paolo Manca,
Mark R. Hazebroek,
Christian Knackstedt,
Marco Merlo,
Stéphane Heymans,
Gianfranco Sinagra
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
journal of the american heart association
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.494
H-Index - 85
ISSN - 2047-9980
DOI - 10.1161/jaha.121.024505
Subject(s) - medicine , ejection fraction , heart failure , cardiology , hazard ratio , dilated cardiomyopathy , cardiomyopathy , stroke volume , confidence interval
Background Speckle tracking echocardiographic global longitudinal strain (GLS) predicts outcome in patients with new onset heart failure. Still, its incremental value on top of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with nonischemic, nonvalvular dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) after optimal heart failure treatment remains unknown. Methods and Results Patients with DCM were included at the outpatient clinics of 2 centers in the Netherlands and Italy. The prognostic value of 2‐dimensional speckle tracking echocardiographic global longitudinal strain was evaluated when being on optimal heart failure medication for at least 6 months. Outcome was defined as the combination of sudden or cardiac death, life‐threatening arrhythmias, and heart failure hospitalization. A total of 323 patients with DCM (66% men, age 55±14 years) were included. The mean LVEF was 42%±11% and mean GLS after optimal heart failure treatment was −15%±4%. Twenty percent (64/323) of all patients reached the primary outcome after optimal heart failure treatment (median follow‐up of 6[4–9] years). New York Heart Association class ≥3, LVEF, and GLS remained associated with the outcome in the multivariable‐adjusted model (New York Heart Association class: hazard ratio [HR], 3.43; 95% CI, 1.49–7.90,P =0.004; LVEF: HR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.11–4.10,P =0.024; GLS: HR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.18–4.29,P =0.015), whereas left ventricular end‐diastolic diameter index, left atrial volume index, and delta GLS were not. The addition of GLS to New York Heart Association class and LVEF improved the goodness of fit (log likelihood ratio testP <0.001) and discrimination (Harrell’s C 0.703).Conclusions Within this bicenter study, GLS emerged as an independent and incremental predictor of adverse outcome, which exceeded LVEF in patients with optimally treated DCM. This presses the need to routinely include GLS in the echocardiographic follow‐up of DCM.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom