Influence of Monitoring Strategy on Assessment of Ablation Success and Postablation Atrial Fibrillation Burden Assessment: Implications for Practice and Clinical Trial Design | Zendy

Martín Aguilar | Zendy; Laurent Macle | Zendy; Marc W. Deyell | Zendy; R. Yao | Zendy; Nathaniel M. Hawkins | Zendy; Paul Khairy | Zendy; Jason G. Andrade | Zendy

Open Access

Influence of Monitoring Strategy on Assessment of Ablation Success and Postablation Atrial Fibrillation Burden Assessment: Implications for Practice and Clinical Trial Design

Author(s) -

Martín Aguilar,

Laurent Macle,

Marc W. Deyell,

R. Yao,

Nathaniel M. Hawkins,

Paul Khairy,

Jason G. Andrade

Publication year - 2021

Publication title -

circulation

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 7.795

H-Index - 607

eISSN - 1524-4539

pISSN - 0009-7322

DOI - 10.1161/circulationaha.121.056109

Subject(s) - medicine , atrial fibrillation , ablation , clinical practice , cardiology , clinical trial , catheter ablation , intensive care medicine , physical therapy

Various noninvasive intermittent rhythm monitoring strategies have been used to assess arrhythmia recurrences in trials evaluating pharmacological and invasive therapeutic interventions for atrial fibrillation (AF). We determined whether a frequency and duration of noninvasive rhythm monitoring could be identified that accurately detects arrhythmia recurrences and approximates the AF burden derived from continuous monitoring using an implantable cardiac monitor (ICM).

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research