No-Touch Versus Conventional Vein Harvesting Techniques at 12 Months After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery: Multicenter Randomized, Controlled Trial
Author(s) -
Meice Tian,
Xian-Qiang Wang,
Hansong Sun,
Wei Feng,
Yunhu Song,
Feng Lü,
Liqing Wang,
Yang Wang,
Bo Xu,
Huaibin Wang,
Su Liu,
Zhigang Liu,
Yu Chen,
Qi Miao,
Pixiong Su,
Yan Yang,
Guo Shaoxian,
Bin Lü,
Zhiqiang Sun,
Kaiyang Liu,
Changwei Zhang,
Yue Wu,
Haitao Xu,
Wei Zhao,
Chao Han,
Xingtong Zhou,
Enshi Wang,
Xiaoning Huo,
Shengshou Hu
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
circulation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 7.795
H-Index - 607
eISSN - 1524-4539
pISSN - 0009-7322
DOI - 10.1161/circulationaha.121.055525
Subject(s) - medicine , odds ratio , angina , artery , occlusion , surgery , vein , computed tomography angiography , angiography , coronary artery bypass surgery , cardiology , randomized controlled trial , unstable angina , myocardial infarction
Vein graft occlusion is deemed a major challenge in coronary artery bypass grafting. Previous studies implied that the no-touch technique for vein graft harvesting could reduce occlusion rate compared with the conventional approach; however, evidence on the clinical benefit and generalizability of the no-touch technique is scare.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom