Associations Between Adding a Radial Artery Graft to Single and Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Grafts and Outcomes
Author(s) -
David P. Taggart,
Douglas G. Altman,
Marcus Flather,
Stephen Gerry,
Alastair Gray,
Belinda Lees,
Umberto Benedetto
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
circulation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 7.795
H-Index - 607
eISSN - 1524-4539
pISSN - 0009-7322
DOI - 10.1161/circulationaha.117.027659
Subject(s) - medicine , internal thoracic artery , radial artery , revascularization , propensity score matching , cardiology , myocardial infarction , surgery , confidence interval , hazard ratio , coronary artery disease , artery , proportional hazards model , coronary artery bypass surgery , clinical endpoint , randomized controlled trial , bypass grafting
Whether the use of the radial artery (RA) can improve clinical outcomes in coronary artery bypass graft surgery remains unclear. The ART (Arterial Revascularization Trial) was designed to compare survival after bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) over single left internal thoracic artery (SITA). In the ART, a large proportion of patients (≈20%) also received an RA graft instead of a saphenous vein graft (SVG). We aimed to investigate the associations between using the RA instead of an SVG to supplement SITA or BITA grafts and outcomes by performing a post hoc analysis of the ART.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom