z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
A Structured Review of Antithrombotic Therapy in Peripheral Artery Disease With a Focus on Revascularization
Author(s) -
Connie N. Hess,
Lars Norgren,
Gary M. Ansel,
Warren H. Capell,
John Fletcher,
F. Gerry R. Fowkes,
Anders Gottsäter,
Kerry Hitos,
Michael R. Jaff,
Joakim Nordanstig,
William R. Hiatt
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
circulation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 7.795
H-Index - 607
eISSN - 1524-4539
pISSN - 0009-7322
DOI - 10.1161/circulationaha.117.024469
Subject(s) - medicine , revascularization , critical limb ischemia , antithrombotic , claudication , randomized controlled trial , coronary artery disease , cardiology , intermittent claudication , context (archaeology) , amputation , percutaneous coronary intervention , surgery , vascular disease , arterial disease , myocardial infarction , paleontology , biology
Peripheral artery disease affects >200 million people worldwide and is associated with significant limb and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Limb revascularization is recommended to improve function and quality of life for symptomatic patients with peripheral artery disease with intermittent claudication who have not responded to medical treatment. For patients with critical limb ischemia, the goals of revascularization are to relieve pain, help wound healing, and prevent limb loss. The baseline risk of cardiovascular and limb-related events demonstrated among patients with stable peripheral artery disease is elevated after revascularization and related to atherothrombosis and restenosis. Both of these processes involve platelet activation and the coagulation cascade, forming the basis for the use of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies to optimize procedural success and reduce postprocedural cardiovascular risk. Unfortunately, few high-quality, randomized data to support use of these therapies after peripheral artery disease revascularization exist, and much of the rationale for the use of antiplatelet agents after endovascular peripheral revascularization is extrapolated from percutaneous coronary intervention literature. Consequently, guideline recommendations for antithrombotic therapy after lower limb revascularization are inconsistent and not always evidence-based. In this context, the purpose of this structured review is to assess the available randomized data for antithrombotic therapy after peripheral arterial revascularization, with a focus on clinical trial design issues that may affect interpretation of study results, and highlight areas that require further investigation.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom