Quality-of-Life Outcomes With Anatomic Versus Functional Diagnostic Testing Strategies in Symptomatic Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease | Zendy

Daniel B. Mark | Zendy; Kevin J. Anstrom | Zendy; Shubin Sheng | Zendy; Khaula Baloch | Zendy; Melanie R. Daniels | Zendy; Udo Hoffmann | Zendy; Manesh R. Patel | Zendy; Lawton S. Cooper | Zendy; Kerry L. Lee | Zendy; Pamela S. Douglas | Zendy

Open Access

Quality-of-Life Outcomes With Anatomic Versus Functional Diagnostic Testing Strategies in Symptomatic Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease

Author(s) -

Daniel B. Mark,

Kevin J. Anstrom,

Shubin Sheng,

Khaula Baloch,

Melanie R. Daniels,

Udo Hoffmann,

Manesh R. Patel,

Lawton S. Cooper,

Kerry L. Lee,

Pamela S. Douglas

Publication year - 2016

Publication title -

circulation

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 7.795

H-Index - 607

eISSN - 1524-4539

pISSN - 0009-7322

DOI - 10.1161/circulationaha.115.020259

Subject(s) - medicine , coronary artery disease , disease , functional testing , quality of life (healthcare) , cardiology , intensive care medicine , medline , nursing , political science , law

The Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain (PROMISE) trial found that initial use of ≥64 detector-row computed tomography angiography versus standard functional testing strategies (exercise ECG, stress nuclear methods, or stress echocardiography) did not improve clinical outcomes in 10 003 stable symptomatic patients with suspected coronary artery disease requiring noninvasive testing. Symptom burden and quality of life (QOL) were major secondary outcomes.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research