z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Lack of Concordance Between Empirical Scores and Physician Assessments of Stroke and Bleeding Risk in Atrial Fibrillation
Author(s) -
Benjamin A. Steinberg,
Sunghee Kim,
Laine Thomas,
Gregg C. Fonarow,
Elaine M. Hylek,
Jack Ansell,
Alan S. Go,
Paul Chang,
Peter R. Kowey,
Bernard J. Gersh,
Kenneth W. Mahaffey,
Daniel E. Singer,
Jonathan P. Piccini,
Eric D. Peterson
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
circulation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 7.795
H-Index - 607
eISSN - 1524-4539
pISSN - 0009-7322
DOI - 10.1161/circulationaha.114.008643
Subject(s) - medicine , atrial fibrillation , stroke (engine) , diabetes mellitus , concordance , heart failure , cardiology , risk assessment , emergency medicine , intensive care medicine , physical therapy , mechanical engineering , computer security , computer science , engineering , endocrinology
Physicians treating patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) must weigh the benefits of anticoagulation in preventing stroke versus the risk of bleeding. Although empirical models have been developed to predict such risks, the degree to which these coincide with clinicians' estimates is unclear.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom