z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Prosthetic Valve Thrombosis in Pregnancy
Author(s) -
Patricia Casais,
Florencia Rolandi
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
circulation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 7.795
H-Index - 607
eISSN - 1524-4539
pISSN - 0009-7322
DOI - 10.1161/circulationaha.113.004259
Subject(s) - medicine , complication , thrombosis , pregnancy , thrombolysis , incidence (geometry) , surgery , genetics , biology , physics , myocardial infarction , optics
Prosthetic heart valve thrombosis (PVT) is a rare complication, with an estimated incidence of 0.1% to 5.7% per patient-year.1 However, during pregnancy, changes in the hemostatic system lead to a procoagulant state that increases the risk of PVT up to 10%.2 This maternal and fetal life-threatening complication is mostly preventable with long-term adequate anticoagulation therapy. When anticoagulation fails, treatment focuses on choosing between cardiac surgery and thrombolysis, 2 therapeutic strategies with risks and benefits for the mother and fetus that are difficult to assess.Article see p 532The study by Ozkan et al3 in this issue of Circulation is the largest series of pregnant patients with prosthetic mitral valve thrombosis reported to date and offers interesting results in a scenario in which randomized, clinical trials are not feasible. A protocol of low-dose, slow infusion of tissue-type plasminogen activator with repeated doses as needed that was guided by transesophageal echocardiography was associated with a successful thrombolysis in all episodes, with no maternal deaths and a fetal mortality rate of 20%, results that seem to be better than those obtained with other thrombolytic strategies reported.The authors’ conclusions on the superiority of thrombolysis over surgery and the redefinition of the lytic option as a first-line therapy in pregnant patients with PVT require careful evaluation. Previous studies of cardiac surgery showing maternal and fetal mortality rates of 6% and 30%, respectively, were published a decade ago and were based mostly on coronary revascularization procedures. Since then, some recommendations have been included, such as appointing the procedure during the second …

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom