Cost-Effectiveness of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease and Abnormal Fractional Flow Reserve
Author(s) -
William F. Fearon,
David Shilane,
Nico H.J. Pijls,
Derek Boothroyd,
Pim A.L. Tonino,
Emanuele Barbato,
Peter Jüni,
Bernard De Bruyne,
Mark A. Hlatky
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
circulation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 7.795
H-Index - 607
eISSN - 1524-4539
pISSN - 0009-7322
DOI - 10.1161/circulationaha.113.003059
Subject(s) - fractional flow reserve , medicine , conventional pci , percutaneous coronary intervention , cardiology , coronary artery disease , revascularization , angina , quality adjusted life year , coronary flow reserve , quality of life (healthcare) , cost effectiveness , myocardial infarction , coronary angiography , risk analysis (engineering) , nursing
The Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) 2 trial demonstrated a significant reduction in subsequent coronary revascularization among patients with stable angina and at least 1 coronary lesion with a fractional flow reserve ≤0.80 who were randomized to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with best medical therapy. The economic and quality-of-life implications of PCI in the setting of an abnormal fractional flow reserve are unknown.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom