Response to Letters Regarding Article, “Second Internal Thoracic Artery Versus Radial Artery in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Long-Term, Propensity Score-Matched Follow-Up Study”
Author(s) -
Elfriede Ruttmann,
Nikolaus Fischler,
Adel Sakic,
Orest Chevtchik,
R Schistek,
Michael Grimm,
Hannes Alber,
Hanno Ulmer
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
circulation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 7.795
H-Index - 607
eISSN - 1524-4539
pISSN - 0009-7322
DOI - 10.1161/circulationaha.112.092288
Subject(s) - medicine , internal thoracic artery , artery , bypass grafting , cardiothoracic surgery , cardiac surgery , coronary artery bypass surgery , cardiology , surgery
We thank Drs Ahmed and Edelman for their interest in our article.1 They expressed concerns about a possible bias toward radial artery (RA) use in comparison with right internal thoracic artery (RITA), because more than two thirds of multiple arterial revascularization (MAR) cases have a RA as a second arterial conduit.The proportion of RA and RITA patients directly reflects the current epidemiological distribution of RA and RITA grafts used. In the United States, the RA is used more than twice as frequently as a RITA graft.2 When applying the inclusion criteria of our study, our institutional MAR rate has been 35% during the past 9 years, reflecting high experience with MAR on a daily routine basis. Only 4 surgeons performed MAR during the whole study period, …
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom