z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparative Outcomes for Patients Who Do and Do Not Undergo Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Stable Coronary Artery Disease in New York
Author(s) -
Edward L. Hannan,
Zaza Samadashvili,
Kimberly Cozzens,
Gary Walford,
Alice K. Jacobs,
David R. Holmes,
Nicholas J. Stamato,
Jeffrey P. Gold,
Sanjeev Sharma,
Ferdinand J. Venditti,
Tia Powell,
Spencer B. King
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
circulation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 7.795
H-Index - 607
eISSN - 1524-4539
pISSN - 0009-7322
DOI - 10.1161/circulationaha.111.071811
Subject(s) - medicine , percutaneous coronary intervention , coronary artery disease , cardiology , disease , percutaneous , myocardial infarction
Little is known about what treatments patients receive after being diagnosed with stable coronary artery disease or what the comparative outcomes are for routine medical treatment (RMT) versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with RMT for patients in a setting apart from randomized controlled trials.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom