z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Response to Letter Regarding Article, “Differential Cardiac Remodeling in Preload Versus Afterload”
Author(s) -
Karl Toischer,
Adam G. Rokita,
Bernhard Unsöld,
Samuel Sossalla,
Alexander Becker,
Tim Seidler,
Cornelia Grebe,
Lena Preuß,
Shamindra N. Gupta,
Kathie Schmidt,
Stephan E. Lehnart,
Katrin Schäfer,
Lars S. Maier,
Gerd Hasenfuß,
Wuqiang Zhu,
Sean Reuter,
Loren J. Field,
Georgios Kararigas,
Vera RegitzZagrosek,
Nils Teucher,
Martina Krüger,
Wolfgang A. Linke,
Johannes Backs
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
circulation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 7.795
H-Index - 607
eISSN - 1524-4539
pISSN - 0009-7322
DOI - 10.1161/circulationaha.110.017566
Subject(s) - preload , afterload , medicine , classics , art history , history , hemodynamics
We would like to thank Reil et al for their interesting discussion. They argue that wall stress of mice with transversal aortic constriction (TAC) may have been higher than those of mice with aortocaval shunt (shunt), which would be supported by lack of brain natriuretic peptide expression in shunt. We believe that we can disprove the arguments and the conclusion of Reil et al for the following reasons: 1. After 1 week of increased load under both conditions, hypertrophy, as measured by left ventricular weight per tibia length, is similarly increased in both models, and this holds true for myocyte minimal fiber diameter as well (Figure 1 of our article).12. It was recently shown under well-controlled in vitro conditions that myocardial expression of brain natriuretic peptide increases only …

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom