z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Improving Lipid Goal Attainment
Author(s) -
Antonio M. Gotto
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
circulation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 7.795
H-Index - 607
eISSN - 1524-4539
pISSN - 0009-7322
DOI - 10.1161/circulationaha.109.871913
Subject(s) - medicine , national cholesterol education program , physical therapy , gerontology , endocrinology , diabetes mellitus , metabolic syndrome
Lowering elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is a surefire way to reduce cardiovascular risk. On the basis of a wealth of clinical trial evidence, guidelines from the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) have established progressively lower LDL-C targets, with the most recent iteration recommending an optional treatment goal of <70 mg/dL for very-high-risk patients.1 Increased attention has focused on addressing global cardiovascular risk, although LDL-C remains the primary target of lipid-lowering therapy.Article see p 28 In this issue of Circulation , Waters et al2 present results from the Lipid Treatment Assessment Project (L-TAP) 2, a survey to determine the percentage of dyslipidemic patients receiving lipid-lowering therapy (which includes diet and exercise) and also achieving their LDL-C goals. The first L-TAP survey was conducted in 1996 to 1997 in the United States with approximately 5000 patients.3 L-TAP 2 assessed nearly twice as many patients in 9 countries, including the United States, Canada, Mexico, Brazil, Spain, the Netherlands, France, Taiwan, and Korea, in 2006 to 2007. The overall LDL-C goal achievement rate in L-TAP 2 was 73%, as compared with 38% in the original L-TAP. As in the last survey, low-risk patients were the most likely to attain their LDL-C goals (86%), whereas high-risk patients experienced more difficulty in reaching their correspondingly lower targets (67%). In the United States, only 35% of patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and at least 2 risk factors attained the optional LDL-C goal of <70 mg/dL. Success rates ranged from 47% to 84% across countries, with the highest rates seen in Korea and the United States. L-TAP 2 also assessed high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels and found that the prevalence of low HDL-C varied widely among countries.The expansion of L-TAP 2 to encompass 9 countries provides …

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom