Comparison of Intravascular Ultrasound and Quantitative Coronary Angiography for the Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease Progression | Zendy

Colin Berry | Zendy; Philippe L. L’Allier | Zendy; JeanClaude Grégoire | Zendy; Jacques Lespérance | Zendy; Sylvie Lévesque | Zendy; Réda Ibrahim | Zendy; JeanClaude Tardif | Zendy

Open Access

Comparison of Intravascular Ultrasound and Quantitative Coronary Angiography for the Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease Progression

Author(s) -

Colin Berry,

Philippe L. L’Allier,

JeanClaude Grégoire,

Jacques Lespérance,

Sylvie Lévesque,

Réda Ibrahim,

JeanClaude Tardif

Publication year - 2007

Publication title -

circulation

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 7.795

H-Index - 607

eISSN - 1524-4539

pISSN - 0009-7322

DOI - 10.1161/circulationaha.106.655654

Subject(s) - intravascular ultrasound , medicine , atheroma , cardiology , lumen (anatomy) , coronary artery disease , stenosis , coronary atherosclerosis , artery , population , radiology , environmental health

The relative merits of quantitative coronary analysis (QCA) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) for the assessment of progression/regression in coronary artery disease are uncertain. To explore this subject further, we analyzed the angiographic and IVUS data derived from a contemporary clinical trial population.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research