Dual-Chamber Versus Single-Chamber Detection Enhancements for Implantable Defibrillator Rhythm Diagnosis | Zendy

Paul A. Friedman | Zendy; Robyn L. McClelland | Zendy; William R. Bamlet | Zendy; Helbert Acosta | Zendy; David J. Kessler | Zendy; Thomas M. Munger | Zendy; Neal G. Kavesh | Zendy; Mark Wood | Zendy; Emile G. Daoud | Zendy; Ali Massumi | Zendy; Claudio Schuger | Zendy; Stephen R. Shorofsky | Zendy; Bruce L. Wilkoff | Zendy; Michael Glikson | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Dual-Chamber Versus Single-Chamber Detection Enhancements for Implantable Defibrillator Rhythm Diagnosis

Author(s) -

Paul A. Friedman,

Robyn L. McClelland,

William R. Bamlet,

Helbert Acosta,

David J. Kessler,

Thomas M. Munger,

Neal G. Kavesh,

Mark Wood,

Emile G. Daoud,

Ali Massumi,

Claudio Schuger,

Stephen R. Shorofsky,

Bruce L. Wilkoff,

Michael Glikson

Publication year - 2006

Publication title -

circulation

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 7.795

H-Index - 607

eISSN - 1524-4539

pISSN - 0009-7322

DOI - 10.1161/circulationaha.105.594531

Subject(s) - medicine , single chamber , rhythm , dual (grammatical number) , cardiology , art , literature

Delivery of inappropriate shocks caused by misdetection of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) remains a substantial complication of implanted cardioverter/defibrillator (ICD) therapy. Whether use of optimally programmed dual-chamber ICDs lowers this risk compared with that in single-chamber ICDs is not clear.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research