Postconditioning
Author(s) -
Jakob VintenJohansen,
Derek M. Yellon,
Lionel H. Opie
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
circulation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 7.795
H-Index - 607
eISSN - 1524-4539
pISSN - 0009-7322
DOI - 10.1161/circulationaha.105.569798
Subject(s) - cape , medicine , atlanta , history , archaeology , metropolitan area , pathology
“From bench to bedside” is a favorite aphorism for the scientifically inclined cardiologist. When the powerful antiischemic effects of preconditioning were discovered in 1996, it was a revolutionary concept: Repetitive brief ischemia could beget protection instead of the logically anticipated increased myocardial damage. The 75% reduction in histological infarct size was truly astounding.1 Early laboratory and clinical studies with concordant mechanisms strongly suggested that this powerful tool would soon have practical application.2,3 It has been a long road (Table) to clinical application, and consistently an elusive goal until the landmark study by Staat et al in this issue of Circulation .4 The major problem has been that the protection provided by preconditioning is a relatively short-lived phenomenon, so that to reduce infarct size it would have to be instituted just before the patient experienced an unannounced myocardial infarction. Furthermore, the recent experimental emphasis on reperfusion-induced cell death5 seems a far cry from clinical reality because there has been no convincing demonstration of major reperfusion injury after revascularization for acute myocardial infarction. The animal experiments show extensive reperfusion damage resulting in large infarcts of up to half of the area at risk after only a relatively short period of ischemia.2,5 Clinicians argue that if such large infarcts were produced by reperfusion, then why does early reperfusion within 1 hour afford such good clinical recovery? View this table:Some Key Events in Evolution of Postconditioning From Preconditioning Article p 2143 These reservations are more than vanquished by the study of Staat et al.4 They used postconditioning, which is as powerful as preconditioning, as discovered by Vinten-Johansen’s group,6 and achieved by repetitive occlusion and reperfusion in the early minutes after revascularization of acute myocardial infarction. Taking enzyme release as an index of myocardial infarction size, they found a reduction …
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom